|
INTRODUCTION
Considering the
recommendations of the Health Survey and Development Committee of
Govt. of India, 1946 and also keeping in view the widespread adverse
effect of malaria on the National Health, economy, industrial and
agriculture growth in the country, the Planning Commission accorded
highest priority to a nation-wide Malaria Control Programme.
The remarkable success of the NMCP and the fact that malaria had
been eradicated in certain countries paved the way for launching the
National Malaria Eradication Programme (NMEP) in the country in
1958. In the plan of operations under NMEP, all roofed structures
in the rural areas received insecticidal coverage under the attack
phase, excepting those in
urban towns with population of
over 40,000. In such areas the residual insecticidal coverage was
confined only to the houses in the peripheral belt to a depth of 0.5
to 1.0 mile. In the rest area in such towns and cities, the antilarval measures were recommended. The implementation of
antilarval measures was made the responsibility of the local
bodies. Many of the local bodies that had been carrying out
antilarval operations earlier failed to continue the same due to
paucity of funds. While on other side, the activities of NMEP have
brought down malaria incidence considerably in rural areas. The
malaria incidence in towns and cities went up manifold after 1963.
This was mainly due to the species, A.stephensi, supplemented
by A.culicifacies mosquitoes breeding in wells, cisterns,
low-lying areas and wet cultivations within the urban limits. It
has also been observed in some towns of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil
Nadu that. A.stephensi had also started breeding in drains and
pools. Secondly, there have been tremendous developmental
activities in the urban areas of the country leading to conditions
very favourable for mosquito breeding. As a result of this, malaria
now being freely disseminated from urban areas to rural areas by the
free movement of people to the big cities and towns in search of
employment in various developmental activities like industries,
constructions, etc. While moving out of urban areas they carry the
infection to rural areas that are already cleared of malaria. Thus
the fresh foci of transmission are established in rural areas.
The control of malaria in the urban areas was thought to be an
important strategy complimentary to the NMEP for
rural areas. Modified Plan of Operation (MPO) was designed and
submitted to the Cabinet to tackle the malaria situation in both
urban and rural areas in the country simultaneously. Under MPO, it
was decided to initiate antilarval and antiparasitic measures to
abate the malaria transmission in urban areas. The proposal to
control malaria in towns was named as Urban Malaria Scheme which was approved
during 1971. It was envisaged that 132 towns would be covered
under the scheme in a phased manner. This scheme was sanctioned
during November, 1971 and the expenditure on this scheme is treated
as plan expenditure in centrally sponsored sector. The central
assistance under this scheme was treated 100 per cent grant to the
State Govts., in kind or in cash.
From 1979-80,
the
expenditure on this scheme is being shared between the centre and
the state Governments on 50:50 basis.
Initially only 23 towns worst affected with malaria were
approved by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare for assistance
under this scheme. During 1972-73, five more towns were selected.
Due to drastic cut in the budget, only these 28 towns continued to
receive assistance under Urban Malaria Scheme and no more towns were
brought under this scheme till 1976-77. Again, a fresh approach was made to
the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and additional 87 towns were brought
under this scheme in three phases – (1977-78 :38, 1978-79;37 and
79-80:12). During 1980-81, it was proposed to extend the activities
of Urban Malaria Scheme to 17 additional towns worst affected with
malaria. At present scheme is functioning in 131 towns.
OBJECTIVES
In Malaria Control
Programme, the main aim is the reduction of the disease to a
tolerable level in which the human population can be protected form
malaria transmission with the available means.
The main objectives of Urban Malaria Scheme (UMS) are:
a)
To control malaria by reducing the vector population in the urban
areas
b)
Reduce morbidity and mortality through EDPT.
Anti-larval
measures
Anopheles stephensi - domestic water breeder an important vector of
Urban
Malaria
-
Container breeder
-
Piped water supply system
-
Overhead and storage tanks
-
Water storage at construction sites
-
Wells
-
Desert coolers
Aedes aegypti - domestic habitat species

This species breeds in domestic and peri-domestic water collections in
a variety of containers in association with Anopheles stephensai. In
outdoor, old tyres and drums are most preferred sites.
Culex quinquefasciatus
- Pest mosquito
The breeds mainly in sullage lakes around houses under un-organized sectors, drains, septic
tanks.
Control
Strategies
The control measures recommended under UMS are as follows:
Source
Reduction
Environmental methods
for controlling most of the breeding include source reduction by
filling ditches, areas, pits, low lying areas, streamlining, channelising, desilting, deweeding,
trimming of drains, water disposal and sanitation, empty water
container once in a week, etc.
Chemical Control
Recurrent anti-larval
measures with approved larvicides to control the vector mosquitoes
are recommended.
The following larvicides are used under UMS
-
Temephos
-
Fenthion
Biological
Control
Bilogical control of mosquito breeding through biological agents
specially larvivorous fish and by larvicides.
Aerosol Space
Spray
Space spraying of Pyrethrum extract(2%) in 50 houses in and around
every malaria positive case to kill the infective mosquitoes.
Anti-parasitic
measures
Anti-parasitic measures through passive agencies like hospitals,
dispensaries, clinics and private practitioners to reduce the
reservoir of infection, by early case detection and prompt
treatment.
Organizational
Set-up
The Urban Malaria Scheme is a centrally sponsored programme being
implemented mainly by local administrative
authorities/Municipalities under the active supervision of state
health authorities. The scheme is implemented at the following
levels:
-
Town level - Biologist is the incharge of the programme
implementation
-
State level - Additional Director (Malaria & Filaria) or Joint
Director (Malaria & Filaria) or Deputy Director (Malaria & Filaria)
is the incharge of the scheme at state level and also supervise the
scheme by offering technical and administrative guidelines for
better execution of the scheme.
-
Central Level - Director NVBDCP monitors the UMS at central
level monitors the scheme and provides technical guidance for its
implementation. The Director of NVBDCP supplies the approved items
as per the norms directly to the UMS towns.
NORMS
a) The towns should have a minimum population of 50,000.
b) The API should be 2 or above.
c) The towns should promulgate and strictly implement the civic
by-laws to prevent/eliminate domestic and peri-domestic breeding
places
STRATEGY
a) Early case
detection & prompt treatment (EDPT) to patients through passive
surveillance institutions such as hospitals, dispensaries and
malaria clinics.
b)
Recurrent anti-larval measures through conventional larvicides in
towns.
c) Minor engineering
methods like source reduction, channelisation, de-weeding, etc.
d)
Biological control using larvivorous fish at appropriate breeding
sites.
e) IEC campaigns for community awareness and their involvement.
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL
SITUATION
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SITUATION OF MALARIA IN TOWNS COVERED UNDER UMS FROM
2001 TO 2004

|